Skip to content

25/55, agreed to in 2005?

October 23, 2007 am31 6:58 am

[Major Edit]

Most of what I wrote below was inaccurate. I have posted a correction here.

In one of the stranger twists I’ve seen, NYC Ed points out that the DoE had already agreed to support 25/55 (not 25/57!) way back two years ago. Look at the third indented paragraph and what follows under the “WHAT DID WE GAIN” heading, here.MetroLink - a whole new way to travel

So if they already agreed, why didn’t we cry foul when they introduced linkage to merit pay? Or did we, the UFT, introduce the link between pension reform and merit pay?

Those are two questions I’d like to see answered.

No comments yet

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: