UFT elections: Unity’s shrinking vote totals
There is no way to sugarcoat the results – Unity’s vote totals fell hard in the 2013 elections. Worse for the ruling caucus, despite an uptick in 2010, this follows an equally dramatic drop in 2007.
Elem | IS/JHS | HS | Functional | Retired | |
2004 | 9,757 | 2,794 | 2,893 | 8,464 | 18,067 |
2007 | 6,252 | 1,499 | 2,183 | 6,464 | 18,864 |
2010 | 7,761 | 1,981 | 2,595 | 7,337 | 20,744 |
2013 | 5,111 | 1,185 | 1,592 | 5,167 | 18,155 |
Retiree totals for Unity are flat:
But totals in each in-service division show sharp downward trends:
A friend suggested this reflects decreasing numbers of teachers with tenure – that tenured people probably vote Unity in the same proportion as years ago. This seems possible, as a contributing cause, but easy to overstate. The totals (below) suggest that people who used to vote Unity stopped.
Subtotals and totals:
Teacher | Inservice | Grand | |
Subtotal | Subtotal | Total | |
2004 | 15,444 | 23,908 | 41,975 |
2007 | 9,934 | 16,398 | 35,262 |
2010 | 12,337 | 19,674 | 40,418 |
2013 | 7,888 | 13,055 | 31,210 |
Ten thousand in service members stopped voting Unity, or retired. But their number of retiree votes did not go up. Any analysis points in one direction: Unity has not replaced significant numbers of the votes it has lost.
How dramatic are the drops?
Unity vote percentage drop by division 2004 – 2013
2004 | 2013 | % Change | |
Elementary | 9,757 | 5,111 | -48% |
IS/JHS/MS | 2,794 | 1,185 | -58% |
High School | 2,893 | 1,592 | -45% |
Teacher Subtotal | 15,444 | 7,888 | -49% |
Functional | 8,464 | 5,167 | -39% |
In Service Subtotal | 23,908 | 13,055 | -45% |
Retirees | 18,067 | 18,155 | 0% |
Grand Total | 41,975 | 31,210 | -26% |
Remember that this has occurred while the non-Unity vote has stayed small, but fairly constant. (Despite votes flipping this election from New Action to MORE, or last election from ICE/TJC to New Action)
My guess is that Unity doesn’t care much, as long as they win. And despite the dramatic looking numbers, they are not close to losing.
(note: I am not certain if all retiree numbers are reported as non-weighted. Weighting can change the percentages in the grand total only)
tk but i need to see the official result in the ny teacher edition
Date: Mon, 6 May 2013 09:24:10 +0000 To: fsmedu@msn.com
There will be an official report to the UFT Exec Board on May 20. I don’t know how detailed the results that will be published in the New York Teacher will be.
When did the US schools started geometric proofs in two column?
I grew up writing my proofs in paragraph forms, letting the thought process take its course. There was a natural flow of ratiocination in this presentation.