Challenge: Explain why the divisibility rule for 3 works
April 26, 2008 am30 3:04 am
Little challenge for some of you. On my return from Scotland, I will write up an explanation of why the divisibility rule for 3 works. I will try to make it accessible to kids.
Do you have ideas? Suggestions? My target date to post the result is no later than Monday evening.
Outline: use base 10 numbers to model something that looks like adding remainders. (maybe 2 or 3 examples with real numbers, then a “challenge,” then one abstract line about base 10. Then generalize to “other bases” (just for an instant) then reapply to modulo 3 with examples with numbers, and then abstract to “the rule”
If you have other ideas, or modifications, or warnings about terminology, or really anything to say at all, please, do.
12 Comments
leave one →

What happens when you divide, say, 25 by 3?
You find out that 25 = 3*8 + 1.
So what’s the remainder when you divide 25 by 3?
It’s the same as the remainder when you divide 3*8 + 1 by 3,
but since 3*8 leaves no remainder, you got just 1.
Now what if I wrote it as 2*10 + 5 and divided that by 3?
Well, that’s not easy because 10 is not 3, you know?
So how about if I rewrite it as 2*9 + 2 + 5 …
Ah ha! Now we can see that dividing it by 3, the first part won’t affect the remainder, so it’s just the same as dividing 2+5 by 3 (in terms of the remainder).
At least, with youngish kids (4th-6th grade?) this would be my approach. Obviously I’ve skipped lots of details here, but this is my outline.
Whaddaya think? Is it any good?
Here’s what I tell kids (6th – 8th grades) when I explain this:
10 is three 3’s with one left over.
100 is thirty-three 3’s with one left over.
It’s easy to see that every power of 10 leaves a remainder of 1 (one left over) when divided by 3.
Now, if we have two 10’s, we’re going to have a bunch of 3’s and two left-overs. Same if we have two 100’s and so on. The number of 10’s or 100’s or 1000’s and so on tells us how many leftovers we are going to have if we set aside our three, or thirty-three, or three hundred thirty-three, etc. 3’s from each set of 10’s or 100’s or 1000’s.
Now if we take a number (written in base 10) each of the digits tells us how many of a certain power of 10 we have. So each digit is going to also contribute that number of “leftovers” when we take out the original 3’s.
So if we have a number like 357, and we want to know if it’s divisible by 3, what we really want to know is, could we split it up into piles of 3, with nothing leftover. So we know our 300 gives us a bunch of piles of 3, with 3 leftover. Our 50 gives us another bunch of piles of 3, with 5 leftover. And then we throw our 7 ones in with the other leftovers. That gives us 3 + 5 + 7 items left to sort into piles of 3, and see if there’s anything left over. Since 3 + 5 + 7 = 15 which is divisible by 3, we can combine all the leftovers into even piles of 3 with nothing left over, so 357 is divisible by 3.
Incidentally, the divisibility rule for 9 obviously works for the same reason!
This is fun and terribly frustrating, as I’m abysmal at Math. When will you be back with the write-up?
my message is to find the divisibility test with the rules
can you please prove how thie divisibility test for 3 works rather than just giving examples
i agree, i need to know how it works generally, not by giving examples.
Comment #2 is pretty good. I will come back some times soon and write up something nice.
WOW!! Thank you, thank you, thank you. My students are going to love this! I set them out to prove this theory last week and was a little nervous b/c I wasn’t sure if I could clearly articulate it myself. Mathmom, you’re amazing! Jd2718, did you also include a write up somewhere else that I haven’t seen?
By the way, I’m really excited to have found this blog. Looking forward to browsing around. I’m a math teacher but have a blog devoted to the arts & poetry for moms and babies.
http://www.sharpmama.wordpress.com
The only way that I can think of to explain this would be as follows: Look at a 2 digit number: 10a+b=9a+(a+b). We know that 9a is divisible by 3, so 10a+b will be divisible by 3 if and only if a+b is. Similarly, 100a+10b+c=99a+9b+(a+b+c), and 99a+9b is divisible by 3, so the total will be iff a+b+c is.
HERE’S HOW I GOT IT?
we know the rule that if sum…………
so the link where do we get the digits from exactly dividing by nth power of ten where n is place from right of the digit in the number -1
so???
if we write th number in the sum of power of ten and then we take out all the digits like this:
xyz=(100-1)x+x+(10-1)*y+y+z
clearly
99x+9y is divisible so no need
remaining
x+y+z
if divisible then whole number is divisible
thus it determines the divisibility of three
thanks!!!!
with regards
RJAZZ MAYUR
from INDIA
hi! rjazz if u liked n approved my way
just express ur-self freely to me
i m a student of arts but love maths
ur appreciation will help me a lot!!!!!
rjazzm@gmail.com