Skip to content

Simple Divisibility Rules

March 30, 2008 pm31 7:32 pm

We all know them… or many of them. But they are great fun (and useful)

2 – if the number ends in 0,2,4,6, or 8, it is divisible by 2
3 – if the sum of the number’s digits is divisible by 3, then the number is divisible by 3
4 – if the number’s last two digits are divisible by 4, then the number is divisible by 4 (if it is not divisible by 2, no need to check – it won’t be divisible by 4)
5 – if the number ends in 0 or 5, the number is divisible by 5
6 – if the number passes the test for 2 and 3 (ends in 0, 2, 4, 6, 8 or 0 and the sum of the digits is a multiple of 3), then the number is divisible by 6
7 – tricky, two methods, future post!
8 – tricky, future post!
9 – if the sum of the number’s digits is divisible by 9, then the number is divisible by 9 (if it is not divisible by 3, no need to check – it won’t be divisible by 9)
10 – if the number ends in 0, it is divisible by 10 (alternately, if it passes the tests for 2 and for 5, then it is divisible by 10)
11 – tricky, with two methods, future post!
13 – tricky, future post!
16 – tricky, future post!
and more and more for future posts.

Some examples:

78 – ends in 2, so divisible by 2. The sum of the digits (7+8=15) is divisible by 3, so 78 is divisible by 3. The last two digits… hm, the number is the last two digits! so we just divide to find that 4 does not go in evenly. The last digit is not 0 or 5, so it is not a multiple of 5. It passes the tests for 2 and 3, so it is a multiple of 6. The sum of its digits is not a multiple of 9, so 78 is not a multiple of 9. And it doesn’t end in 0, so it is not a multiple of 10.

1234 – ends in 2, so is divisible by 2. The sum of the digits (1+2+3+4=10) is not divisible by 3, so 1234 is not divisible by 3. The last two digits, 34, are not divisible by 4, so 1234 is not divisible by 4. It doesn’t end with 0 or 5, so not divisible by 0 or 5. It passes the test for 2, but not for 3, so it is not divisible by 6. The sum of the digits is not divisible by 9, so not divisible by 9. Doesn’t end in 0, not divisible by 10.

271845 – ends in 5, so not divisible by 2. The sum of the digits (2+7+1+8+4+5=27) is divisible by 3, so 271845 is divisible by 3.  It is not divisible by 2, so it won’t be divisible by 4. It ends in a 5, so it is divisible by 5. It passes the test for 3, but fails for 2, so it is not a multiple of 6. The sum of the digits (27) is divisible by 9, so it is divisible by 9. It does not end in 0, so it is not divisible by 10.

9 Comments leave one →
  1. March 30, 2008 pm31 8:20 pm 8:20 pm

    I love this post. When I taught sixth grade math, we had so much fun with the rules of Divisibility. I still find myself looking at numbers and thinking of all of the ways they can be divided. I am looking forward to your future posts.

  2. March 31, 2008 am31 5:15 am 5:15 am

    Thank you! Did the kids already know the rules when they reached you? And did you just teach math? or all the subjects? 6th grade is such a weird year.

    In my next post, I will attempt to explain in ways that kids or non-mathy adults might understand, why these rules work. I think you’ll like that one, too.

  3. April 1, 2008 pm30 8:22 pm 8:22 pm

    I taught four classes of math and one language arts class. The students did not know the rules when they arrived in my class. It was great fun because I would use the rules when making up challenge problems for them, like reducing fractions.

  4. April 2, 2008 pm30 3:09 pm 3:09 pm

    Isn’t amazing that, given the opportunity, we can convince at least some kids that math is fun?

    And fractions? You got kids to like playing with fractions? Bravo!

  5. dig permalink
    August 30, 2012 pm31 12:00 pm 12:00 pm

    thanks for the good explaination. it really helped me..,

  6. dig permalink
    August 30, 2012 pm31 12:02 pm 12:02 pm

    thanks for the good explaination. it really helped me.., thanks again

  7. Anonymous permalink
    October 12, 2012 am31 9:31 am 9:31 am

    Please may I have the “Divisibility Rules of 16,17 and 18”

  8. October 17, 2012 am31 7:08 am 7:08 am

    it thoughts me very well. many children can learn in this.

Trackbacks

  1. Simple divisibility rules - first explanations « JD2718

Leave a comment